Craik Tulving Levels of processing1975Craik amp加工水平1975.pptVIP

5) What type of variable is this: A variable that could affect the DV but has been controlled for so it doesn’t. (weather) Extraneous Variable (Confounding Variable: a variable that effects the DV - height) 6) is this a single blind or a double blind? The researchers (and those involved in the study) do not tell the participants if they are being given a test treatment or a control treatment. Single Blind 7) How many conditions are an independent measures group in? 1, 2, 3? 1 8) is this a 1-tailed hypothesis or a 2-tailed hypothesis? Participants who [do something] will be significantly [faster/better/quicker etc] at [something] than participants who [do something else]. A one tailed hypothesis as it specifies a directional relationship between groups 9) Complete the missing words Structural Processing: Appearance Phonetic Processing: Sound Semantic Processing: Meaning GLOVE Does the word fit the category ‘part of a ship’? mast Does the word rhyme with ‘noose’ juice Is the word in capital letters? daisy Thank you. That completes this part of the study Now answer these maths questions How did you do? On the next slide you will see all the target words used. Write down as many as you can remember. capitals rhyme category sentence field brush honey nurse daisy soap pool claw sheet juice mast dance glove twig fence lamp Which of these was on the first slide? Check how many you got. Which were structural (shallow), phonemic (intermediate), semantic (deep)? All notes to be taken on worksheet Aim Craik Tulving wanted to test the levels of processing (LOP) framework. They wanted to see if structural processing led to low recall, phonetic processing led to better recall and semantic processing led to the best recall. Aim When referring to better recall they meant that the memory trace was durable – it would fade most quickly when material was structurally processed and least quickly with semantic processing. Craik Tulving also wanted to investigate i