- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
PresentationEvaluationSheetPresentationEvaluationSheet
PowerPoint Presentation Evaluation Sheet
Evaluator’s Name ____________________________ Period ____________
Given the criteria for an effective presentation, rate the presentation on a scale of 1—5.
?5—Excellent
4—Above Average
3—Average
2—Below Average
1—Not Effective
TOPIC OF PRESENTATION Content
(The presentation was factual and informative. The major points were made clearly and concisely) Text Formatting
(Font type size is readable; no spelling/ grammar errors) Organization
(content is well organized and easy to read.) Delivery
(speaks clearly, makes eye contact, and delivers smoothly.) Attractiveness
(Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc.) Total Points
(out of 25)
EVALUATING A PRESENTATION
?
TOPIC OF PRESENTATION: ????? Given the criteria for an effective presentation, rate the presentation on a scale of 1—5.
?
5—Excellent
4—Above Average
3—Average
2—Below Average
1—Not Effective
?
In the space provided below each detail, note specifics as to why you rated the presentation this way. Presentation Detail: Rating: Message is focused ????? ????? Design is simple, easy to read, appropriate for the content ????? ????? Attractive colors that make the slides easy to read. ????? ????? Concise Text:
(limit 6 lines w/ 6 words per line) ????? ????? Only one concept per slide ????? ????? Appropriate use of White Space ????? ????? Fonts—no more than 2 fonts, bold and italics used sparingly, text not smaller than 18 point ????? ????? Visuals used effectively to communicate the message (do not overcrowd a slide) ????? ????? ?
Oral Presentation Evaluation Sheet
As discussed in class, your oral presentations are evaluated on content, organization and delivery. I have structured this evaluation sheet into these three categories to provide clear feedback in terms of your presentation. Areas for improvement are indicated with a mark next to related criteria.
Please feel free to discuss t
您可能关注的文档
- Part V. Twentieth Century Literature (I) Before WWII.doc
- passage A.doc
- Passage Four.doc
- PassWorld联盟项目及预科.docx
- Pay attention to quality problems.doc
- Pay attention to the engineering change.doc
- PBL案例征集申请书.doc
- PA考试准备-Evan讲座(三)11.30.docx
- Pay much attention to the old.docx
- PA部工作手册.doc
- 人教版一年级下册数学课件二 20以内的退位减法第8课时 练一练.pptx
- 北师版七年级生物下册课件第11章 人体的运动第3节 运动的形成.pptx
- 人教版一年级下册数学课件三 100以内数的认识第5课时 数的顺序.pptx
- 2025年度LED显示屏远程监控维护服务合同范本3篇.docx
- 2025年度LED照明产品智能化升级改造合同范本3篇.docx
- 2025年度LED照明产品智能控制系统研发与集成合同3篇.docx
- 2025年度LED智慧交通信号系统建设与维护合同3篇.docx
- 2025年度LED灯带批发业务合作协议书3篇.docx
- 专业技术培训的专业操守考核试卷.docx
- 合成材料制造的质量控制与建模方法考核试卷.docx
文档评论(0)