ppt课件-disaggregationandmasterproductionscheduling(mps).pptVIP

Detailed Production Planning Shop-Floor Control Dealing with the Problem Complexity through Decomposition Disaggregation and Master Production Scheduling(MPS) The (Master) Production Scheduling Problem MPS Example: Company Operations Example: Implementing the Empirical Approach in Excel Computing Inventory Positions and Net Requirements Problem Decision Variables: Scheduled Releases Testing the Schedule Feasibility Fixing the Original Schedule Infeasible Production Requirements A feasible schedule with spoilage effects Computing Spoilage and Modified Inventory Position The Driving Logic behind the Empirical Approach Manufacturing Resource PlanningScheduling The “MRP Explosion” Calculus Example: The (complete) MRP Explosion Calculus The “MRP Explosion” Calculus Computing the item Scheduled Releases Lot Sizing If affordable, a lot-for-lot (L4L) policy will incur the lowest inventory holding costs and it will maintain a smoother production flow. Possible reasons for departure from a L4L policy: High set up times and costs = need for serial process batching to control the capacity losses Processes that require a large production volume in order to maintain a high utilization (e.g., fermentors, furnaces, etc.) = need for parallel process batching Selection of a pertinent process batch size It must be large enough to maintain feasibility of the production requirements It must control the incurred inventory holding costs, and/or part delays (this is a measure of disruption to the production flow caused by batching) Move or transfer batches: The quantities in which parts are moved between the successive processing stations. They should be as small as possible to maintain a smooth process flow Some Lot Sizing Methods employed in the traditional MRP framework Main focus: Balance set-up and holding costs Wagner-Whitin Algorithm for dynamic Lot Sizing Economic Order Quantity (EOQ): Compute a lot size using the EOQ formula with the demand rate D set equal to the