ppt课件-u s p t o presentation template（u s p t o表示模板）.pptVIP

下载本文档

8
0
约6.98千字
约 19页
2017-01-25 发布于四川
举报
版权申诉

ppt课件-u s p t o presentation template（u s p t o表示模板）.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Views Visions from the USPTO AIPLA Webcast Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Reexamination Filings Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Statutory Requirements Regulatory Requirements Case Law: In re Swanson Common Defects Best Practices Statutory Requirements The request must be in writing and must be accompanied by payment of a reexamination fee. 35 U.S.C. 302 The request must set forth the pertinency and manner of applying cited prior art to every claim for which reexamination is requested. 35 U.S.C. 302 [T]he Director will determine whether a substantial new question of patentability affecting any claim of the patent concerned is raised by the request. 35 U.S.C. 303 Regulatory Requirements If the request does not include the fee for requesting ex parte reexamination required by 37 CFR 1.510 (a) and meet all the requirements of 37 CFR 1.510 (b), requester will be notified and generally given an opportunity to complete the request. If there is a failure to comply with the notice, the ex parte reexamination request will not be granted a filing date. See 37 CFR 1.510 (c) - (d). Parallel sections exist in 37 CFR 1.915 for inter partes requests. Content of Request The complete reexamination fee A statement pointing out each substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) based on the cited patents and publications An identification of every claim for which reexamination is requested A detailed explanation of how all of the cited documents are applied to the claims for which reexamination is requested. For each identified SNQ, the request must explain how all of the cited documents identified for that SNQ are applied to meet/teach the claim limitations to thus establish the identified SNQ Content of Request A copy* of every patent or printed publication relied upon or referred to in the request Some translation (at least of the necessary and pertinent portion(s)) of any non-English language patent or printed publication A