Energy Storage Methods for Renewable Energy Integration and可再生能源集成的能源储存方法.pptVIP

下载本文档

10
0
约1.81万字
约 21页
2017-02-13 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Energy Storage Methods for Renewable Energy Integration and可再生能源集成的能源储存方法.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

* Considering the number of kW-h that needs to be stored, the CAES system would have a capital cost of $135,000,000. Also, because of the volume of water that needs to be stored, additional reservoirs will be required to meet that level. The amount of money paid to the utility will increase with a decrease in the number of turbines used, and therefore a decrease in capital costs. What effect does this have on payback? * The amount of money paid to the utility will increase with a decrease in the number of turbines used, and therefore a decrease in capital costs. What effect does this have on payback? * * * * * Simple payback on storing energy scenarios increased so much from the previous analysis because the reduction in capital costs by reducing the number of turbines is such a small reduction in percentage of capital costs due to the very expensive CAES system. This effect does not compensate for the increased amount paid annual to the utility, in fact it makes it much worse. * * * 01/08/2009 Using Wind Energy to Offset Irrigation Costs:A Systems-Modeling Case Study Dustin Shively Todd Haynes Dr. John Gardner Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Boise State University Introduction Farm in Southern Idaho (SWI) Water is pumped from a stream 300 feet up a plateau During the most intensive pumping months, over $100,000 per month for electricity Total spent in 2006 for electricity: $431,192 17% from demand charge Anemometer data for over three years 3 – GE 1.5MW turbines Introduction Analysis PURPA HOMER analysis indicated economically infeasible at current rates Net-Metering 2 MW power capacity (Idaho currently only allows 100 kW) Under a net-metering contract, SWI Farm would pay ~25% less than 2006 Storage Options may exist using wind energy to: Pump and store water Store energy both Analysis Store Water Volume of water needed ? Store Energy Amount of energy needed ? Energy → Poweravg → Flowrateavg → Volume Modeling Store Water GE 1.5MW win