- 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
人工髋关节置换术后翻修原因及疗效分析.doc
人工髋关节置换术后翻修原因及疗效分析
[摘要] 目的 分析人工髋关节置换术后翻修原因及疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2006年3月~2012年6月重庆三峡中心医院收治的36例人工髋关节置换术失败进行翻修患者的临床资料,观察髋关节功能Harris标准评分及恢复情况。 结果 本研究获随访36例,随访时间8~68个月,平均34个月。无感染复发病例、无人工髋关节脱位、假体松动及下沉等。术前髋关节功能评分为31~46分,平均(39.00±4.97)分,术后髋关节功能评分为73~96分,平均(91.00±5.43)分,术后明显优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。髋关节功能恢复优23例,良11例,优良率为94.4%。 结论 髋关节置换术后翻修的主要原因与手术操作技术和患者自身因素有关。强调术前必须作详细评估,严格掌握手术指征,提高手术技能,正确选择假体,重视感染预防,增强术后护理质量及患者自我保护意识等,是提高人工髋关节翻修术治疗效果的重要措施。
[关键词] 髋关节;人工关节;并发症;翻修术
[中图分类号] R473.6[文献标识码] A[文章编号] 1673-7210(2014)06(b)-0057-04
Reason and curative effect analysis of revision of total hip arthroplasty
FENG Shilong GUAN Qun▲ TANG Jin XIONG Xiaojiang CHENG Jun LUO Xinwei
Department of Orthopedics, Three Gorges Central Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 404000, China
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the reason and curative effect of revision of total hip arthmplasty. Methods Clinical data of 36 cases performed the revision of total hip arthmplasty for total hip arthmplasty failure from March 2006 to June 2012 in Three Gorges Central Hospital of Chongqing were retrospectively analyzed. The Harris hip score and recovery were observed. Results 36 of the cases were followed up for 8-68 months, and the average time were 34 months. No complications such as infection,dislocation and loosening and submersion of the prothesis occurred. The postoperative Harris hip score before operation was 31-46 scores,and the mean score was (39.00±4.97) scores, the postoperative Harris hip score after operation was 73-96 scores, and the mean score was (91.00±5.43) scores, Harris hip score in postoperative was better than preoperative, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). There were 23 cases with excellent recovery, 11 cases with good recovery, the good rate was 94.4%. Conclusion The main reason for the revision of total hip arthmplasty is related to operation skills and the patients own factors. The detail preoperative evaluation is necessary, master the operation indications
文档评论(0)