PLSI Utilization for Automatic Thesaurus Construction利用编程自动词库建设.pptVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约2.02万字
约 37页
2017-03-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

PLSI Utilization for Automatic Thesaurus Construction利用编程自动词库建设.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

PLSI Utilization for Automatic Thesaurus Construction利用编程自动词库建设

Outline Introduction Comparison of contextual information Sentence co-occurrence, proximity, dependency Indirect dependency Formalization Context extraction Synonym acquisition method Evaluation Experiment Conclusion Outline Introduction Comparison of contextual information Sentence co-occurrence, proximity, dependency Indirect dependency Formalization Context extraction Synonym acquisition method Evaluation Experiment Conclusion Introduction Automatic synonym acquisition Basic technique for automatic thesaurus/ontology construction and various NLP tasks Based on Distributional Hypothesis [Harris 1985] “Semantically similar words share similar contexts” Extracts and uses various contexts of words Common approach for synonym acquisition First goal Investigation of effective contexts for automatic synonym acquisition Sentence co-occurrence Proximity Dependency Outline Introduction Comparison of contextual information Sentence co-occurrence, proximity, dependency Indirect dependency Formalization Context extraction Synonym acquisition method Evaluation Experiment Conclusion Category(1) – Sentence co-occurrence (sent) Sentences in which words appear Assume that words that commonly appear in the similarsentences are semantically similar Category(2) – Proximity (prox) Words that appear in the vicinity of the target word Consider a window centered at the target，and extract the words located within Category(3) – Dependency (dep) Dependency between words Performance evaluation experiment Difference of prox and dep Why is prox better than dep? Difference of prox and dep Why is prox better than dep? Difference of prox and dep Why is prox better than dep? Difference of prox and dep Why is prox better than dep? Difference of prox and dep Why is prox better than dep? Objectives Propose indirect dependency as a wayto enhance the contextual information Indirect dependency = multiple steps of dependency Direct dependency = single dependency step Investigate the effectiveness of