Social Rejection Cue Survey 京都大学京都大学社会调查的线索。.pptVIP

* Tit for Tat noise: 70% probability of exactly the same as S’; 15% of time -1, 15% of time, +1. Transition: First let’s look at how Ss behaved without any facial disapproval feedback. I’ll show you means for first and second blocks of 10 trials. Patterns are familiar and plausible ones. * Note that the opportunities for exploitation are still there. Partner never retaliates for defection in either of the last two conditions, no matter what the S does. But when his cooperative behavior is accompanied by a dollop of “social disapproval” for defection, those opportunities are not seized. Rather, Ss shift to where they are unlikely to get further disapproval. Interesting to note that if one compared High (7-9) with Mod (4-6) strategy, there was no difference. Here, Ss were more responsive to expressed disapproval (strong main and interaction effect) than to the partner’s level of cooperation (no strategy effect or Block x Strategy interaction). * I began this talk by recounting how Galileo had been coerced into renouncing his beliefs, not through actual torture, but simply by being shown the instruments of torture; No: not just a form of social communication (here’s what I expect you to do); otherwise, we’d expect to see the effect in all strategies or at least when there was no known strategy Yes: If behavior and affect are generally consistent, affect changes the impact of behavior!! That prompted us to ask a related question, viz. * 1631, Galileo published “Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems” 1633, he was interrogated by the Roman Inquisition, and pressed to recant. “The aged Galileo, in his 70s, was taken down into the dungeons of the church and shown the instruments of torture that were going to be used on him if he did not recant.? Fearing the torture, and fearing that he might share the fate of Giordano Bruno, whom the church burned at the stake a generation earlier for the same crime, Galileo recanted the truth.? He was confined to his h