DSA图像质量影响因素及旋转DSA造影技术的应用价值.docVIP

DSA图像质量影响因素及旋转DSA造影技术的应用价值.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
DSA图像质量影响因素及旋转DSA造影技术的应用价值.doc

DSA图像质量影响因素及旋转DSA造影技术的应用价值   [摘要] 目的 研究DSA图像质量影响因素及旋转DSA造影技术的应用价值。 方法 整群选取该院2012年4月―2013年10月收治的52例行动脉血管造影检查的脑血管疾病患者,分别采用常规DSA血管造影诊断(记为对照组)和旋转DSA血管造影诊断(记为观察组)。观察两组造影成像的质量并分析其影响因素,探讨旋转DSA造影技术的应用价值。 结果两组均取得较好的造影图像质量,对照组图像清晰度优良率84.62%较观察组80.77%差异无统计学意义(P0.05),其中造影采集图像时患者头部的摆动、造影剂使用不合理以及采集图像曝光时间段是影响成像质量的主要因素;观察组瘤颈显示率98.08%较对照组82.69%显著较高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),观察组观察最大瘤颈直径为3.6 mm,对照组观察仅为3.2 mm。 结论 患者的配合程度、造影操作的专业度是影响成像质量的主要因素;旋转DSA造影能较好的观察动脉血管和动脉瘤颈病变情况,可为临床诊断提供可靠依据。   [关键词] 数字减影血管造影;旋转DSA;图像质量;应用价值   [中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)02(a)-0181-02   Influence Factors of DSA Image Quality and Application Value of Rotational DSA Angiography   CUI Yong-qiang   Cath Lab, Zhumadian Central Hospital, Zhumadian,Henan Province,463000 China   [Abstract] Objective To research the influence?factors of DSA image quality and application value of rotational DSA angiography. Methods 52 cases of patients with cerebrovascular disease receiving arterial angiography in our hospital from April 2012 to October 2013 were selected and divided into two groups, the control group were diagnosed by conventional DSA angiography, the observation group were diagnosed by rotational DSA angiography, the imaging quality of the two groups was observed and its influence factors were analyzed, the application value of rotational DSA angiography was discussed. Results The imaging quality of both groups was good, the difference in the excellent and good rate of image definition between the control group and the observation group was not obvious (84.62% vs 80.77%), and the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05), the main influence factors of imaging quality were head swing of patients when collecting contrastographic pictures, unreasonable use of radiocontrast agent and exposure time period of contrastographic pictures; the displaying rate of aneurysmal neck in the observation group was obviously higher than that in the control group (98.08% vs 82.69%), the difference was statistically

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档