Destructive or Constructive----A Multi-dimensional Discussion on Premarital Cohabitation on Campus 英语专业毕业论文.docx

Destructive or Constructive----A Multi-dimensional Discussion on Premarital Cohabitation on Campus 英语专业毕业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共26页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Destructive or Constructive ----A Multi-dimensional Discussion on Premarital Cohabitation on Campus Contents Abstract (English) 2 Abstract (Chinese) 1. Introducing cohabitation as social phenomenon 2 2. Defining cohabitation 4 3. Biological and physiological perspectives 5 4. Sociological and psychological perspectives 7 5. Economic perspectives 10 6. Moral and legal perspectives 14 7. Related discussion------ birth control 15 8. Conclusion 16 Reference 17 Destructive or Constructive ----A Discussion on Premarital Cohabitation on Campus Abstract As an emerging social phenomenon it’s hard to define “premarital cohabitation” as constructive or destructive simply. According to several professors, Civil Law of China, and Oxford Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese Dictionary, the subject discussed in this paper will be limited: Unmarried college students cohabitation with sex behavior. And in view of the subject’s complexity, the discussion is carried on with the knowledge of philosophy, psychology, sociology, physiology, literature, economics, and ethics. Although the boundary line between constructive and destructive is still blurred after discussion, a prudent policy should be adopted when college students decide to have s try. However, that is better if they don’t. Key words: oppression sex premarital cohabitation liberation 摘要: 早在20世纪60年代英美等国就出现过所谓的“性解放”运动,40多年后面对性自由带来的危害,新一轮的讨论又开始了。目前中国出现的婚前同居,丁克家庭,单亲母亲,独身等一系列新名词就像股市的一条“阳线”刺激着我们的视觉和听觉。对于向来讳莫如深的话题“性”,中国人再也坐不住了:10月16日~18日,中国人民大学召开首届中国“性存在(sexuality)”研讨会——其重要成果被称之为中国“性革命”蓝皮书。有关“同居”的电视剧,文章,网络帖子如雨后春笋。甚至正在拟订的中国第一部《民法》草案也提到了“婚前同居”。作为即将跨入社会的当代大学生,应该如何看待这种社会现象及身体力行呢?本文本着解决实际问题的态度,结合前沿研究成果从:哲学,生理学,文学,心理学,社会学,经济学,以及教育,宗教,道德等多方面入手究其根底。以期从整体上分析研究“婚前同居”对社会造成及将要造成的建设性影响和破坏性影响。从而为迷航的船只贡献一丝光芒。 关键词:压迫,性,婚前同居,解放 1. Introducing cohabitation as social phenomenon Several raindrops splash in the quiet pond which presaging an immediate storm. And an emerging phenomenon unprecedented in the history of Chinese campuses is

文档评论(0)

绿风 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档