网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

COLLABORATION – A THREAT TO ACADEMIC AUTONOMY.pdf

COLLABORATION – A THREAT TO ACADEMIC AUTONOMY.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
COLLABORATION – A THREAT TO ACADEMIC AUTONOMY

COLLABORATION – A THREAT TO ACADEMIC AUTONOMY? Sandra Jones School of Management RMIT University, Australia sandra.jones@.au Abstract Universities have historically encouraged individual academics with research expertise in a discrete area of study to undertake research and teaching in their discipline. In this process academics have had full autonomy, from the discovery of knowledge, the method used to integrate and interpret it, and the means used to convey it to students and to assess student learning. In recent times pressures for change have affected universities. First, business requires graduates with broad knowledge and skill capabilities as well as discipline-based content knowledge. Second, universities are required to demonstrate quality control and improvement. Third, private expenditure has replaced a previous almost complete reliance on publicly provided university places. Finally, technological advance has made possible more flexible and innovative learning opportunities. It is argued in this paper that these changes require a new culture of collaboration to supplement academic autonomy. Academics are required to collaborate across disciplines. Cross-functional collaboration is required between academic and non-academics. In so doing the paper calls for university structures and practices that support collaboration. Keywords collaboration, universities, academic autonomy Introduction – The External Environment It is argued that the productivity of a modern corporation lies more in its intellectual and systems capabilities than its hard assets. Quinn, Anderson and Finkelstein (1996) state that the intellect of an organisation lies within the firm’s human brain and includes “cognitive knowledge (know what), advanced skills (know how), systems understanding and trained intuition (know why), and self- motivated creativity (care why)” (p. 7). Developing intellect, they go on to argue, requires a move away from traditional organisational cognitive skills tr

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档