不同方式绿激光汽化术治疗老年良性前列腺增生的比较.pdfVIP

不同方式绿激光汽化术治疗老年良性前列腺增生的比较.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同方式绿激光汽化术治疗老年良性前列腺增生的比较.pdf

500 J Mod Urol, Vol. 21 No.7 Jul. 2016 ·临床研究· 不同方式绿激光汽化术治疗老年良性前列腺增生的比较 刘百 )11 ,杨国胜,邱晓拂,钟瑞论,李高远 (广东省第二人民医院泌尿外科,广东广州 510317) Exploring the improvement of the greenlight photoselective vaporesection of the prostate-shovel technique and side light green laser vaporization of prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia of elderly patients LIU Bai-chuan , YANG Guo-sheng , QIU Xiao-fu , ZHONG Rui-lun , LI Gao-yuan (Department of Urology , Guangdong No. 2 Provincial Peoples Hospital , Guangzhou 510317 , China) ABSTRACT: Objective Exploring the improvement of the greenlight photosel巳 ctive vaporesection of the prostate-shovel technique andplasmakinetic resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia of elderly patients. Methods Accord? ing to the operation mod巳 of the patients, including the greenlight photoselective vaporesection of the prostate-shovel technique and side light green laser vaporization of prostat巳, the patients were divid巳d into the research group and control group patients. Th巳 times of nocturia , residual urine , maximum urinary flow ra 忧, the time of operation , postop巳 rative catheter indwelling time , length of hospital stay , and the numb巳 r of again visits patients postoperative one year internal was recorded. According to international prostate symptom scor巳(l PSS) , the degree of voiding dysfunction of patients were evaluated , and in accordance with quality of Life CQO L) Assessment to assess of the patients QOL. Postoperativ巳 recovery was compar巳d between the two groups. Results There was 50 patients in the research group and 58 patients in control group. The operation time and the postoperative indwelling catheter time of the research group were significantly shorter than

文档评论(0)

heroliuguan + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8073070133000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档