Empiricism or scientism-.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 5 Empiricism or scientism? In the previous article, I described the ‘Company School tyrants’ all the outstanding performance, they are clearly different from a traditional business is that they seem relatively wide border capabilities, they do not see the viability in the end it seems that they can enter the new industrial areas and create superior results. ordinary business can do their own third of an acre on the good. distinction between what is? I think the biggest difference, ‘the company learned tyrants’ with traditional enterprise philosophy and approach that traditional ways of doing business enterprises to adopt empiricism, and ‘Company School tyrants’ insisted operating method scientism. Years ago when I graduated from college into the enterprise, is facing a full arena atmosphere business environment. Then a lot of the company’s managers are capable of some rivers and lakes, a rich social experience and wide connections, work ability. those of us who just graduated from college, in the face of these hotshots can only be respectful, because, in their view, the youngster out of the university campus, know what? company promotion of cadres, work experience and basically look at experience, and do not look at the potential of a cadre, there is a tendency even vaguely ‘anti-intellectualism’, for example, students are marginalized prestigious universities, and graduate students, especially Ph.D., is privately despised, I often heard of Dr. After graduate assigned to the enterprise, marginalized, or even be ‘repaired’ story. Then in the corporate world to popular belief, is capable good things, I believe that experience, I believe that qualifications are not willing to follow the scientific method and logic, which is operating methods of empiricism, but also hidden consciousness ‘anti-intellectualism’ in To know, before long, the whole of China is still in shouting ‘The more knowledge the more reactionary’ slogan, these familiar