European companies with U.S. companies the management model comparison.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 5 European companies with U.S. companies the management model comparison After the 1970s, pollution, poison gas experiments in 1984, India’s Bhopal (Bhopal) pesticide disaster and in 1989 the United States埃克森瓦尔兹 (Exxon Valdez) oil spill and a series of events inspired by environmental problems, since the 1980s , sustainable development of almost any company to talk about the theme. But the dot-com bubble in 2000 occurred in this period, U.S. investors touted the company to start in pursuit of short-term profit growth rate of the race. It turned out, from Wall Street investors, the impact of the decision-making, can not break the company needs to maintain sustained growth in the truth. 2005 companies such as Hewlett-Packard, Kodak and other performance of the company turmoil, formally proposed a steady, sustainable growth as the company’s decision-making level warnings. While the American-style corporate governance to withstand a series of setbacks, but it does not say that it is American-style management, failed because the European School of Management programs are still in the United States as a template, together with management of the game itself is full of. But now a growing number of European companies in research management. European companies with U.S. companies the difference between the following points: First of all, European companies to pursue a wide range of values, rather than the interests of investors as the sole chief selling point, which means that European companies will take into account the changes in multiple factors, which makes European companies in the development process has shown multiple personalities. To Siemens, this has a century-old European companies, for example, although you will feel conservative, boring, but it has more than 4,000 patents a year of technical innovation capability, even in the field of emerging technologies ahead of the U.S. company, bringing you that do not have doubt his vitality.