It is time to defeat the Procter amp;amp; Gamble.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 4 It is time to defeat the Procter amp;amp; Gamble Couple of days ago bought a bottle of Rain-cleaning of the anti-dandruff shampoo moisture. Wash the hair feeling pretty good. I previously (almost 10 years of bar) is almost always are used in P amp;amp; G’s shampoo. Spent Rejoice use Head amp;amp; Shoulders, Clairol run out of use Head amp;amp; Shoulders, Clairol run out of use Pantene. Why do I almost always used before the P amp;amp; G’s shampoo? P amp;amp; G’s products because I think the quality quite good. In addition, there is no other brand has come to impress me. Why do I think of to try other than P amp;amp; G shampoo? Because old age is more than a dozen P amp;amp; G’s shampoo wash, feeling really tired. Another reason is that I came to understand: In fact, the cost of shampoo are similar, advertising blowing milk products are rich in essence, ginseng essence, and so, in fact, are nonsense. Why did you suddenly will want to try pull-fang Yu-Jie of shampoo? Because I heard a relative introduced, LAF production of shampoo and washing up and worked very well. I clean their own use of the rain to tell a colleague. The staff actually like me, almost 10 years, and have been using are P amp;amp; G’s shampoo. I asked him: Why do not want to try other than P amp;amp; G’s shampoo? He said: afraid of those manufacturers do not guarantee product quality. It makes sense! There may be a considerable number of consumers have the same thoughts with him! Chinese daily chemical enterprises as long as consumers are able to eliminate this fear is entirely possible pairs of P amp;amp; G to form a powerful blow, or even to replace the P amp;amp; G’s dominance. Why worry that the Chinese consumers of shampoo production quality is not protected? Reason 1: The Chinese daily chemical enterprises the technological level of the original implementation is indeed a long time, consumers have left a ‘backward, non-insurance’ impression. Reason 2: Despi