Litigation in the medical burden of proof of Philosophy.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 10 Litigation in the medical burden of proof of Philosophy [Keywords:] burden of proof in civil litigation of medical thinking April 1, 2002 implemented the lt;lt;Supreme Court on the provisions of Civil Evidencegt;gt; Article IV, “due to medical tort action arising from acts, from medical institutions, medical practices and the damage there is no causal relationship between the results and there is no burden of proof of medical mistakes. “This provision will be different from the general medical tort civil lawsuit,” who alleges evidence “burden of proof principle of distribution, the implementation burden of proof. In recent years the media on medical infringement reported at great length, successive nurse-patient disputes and endless variety of arguments we raised in the judicial practice of China burden of proof in medical tort litigation provisions of the discussions on the impact of nursing work. dialectically, both positive effects also have adverse effects from the test of practice perspective, there are advantages and disadvantages. A correct understanding of the positive significance of Burden of Proof 1.1 The burden of proof by the medical establishment can be objective, informative, scientific, comprehensive, and effective delivery of evidence in order to avoid subjective, arbitrary, one-sided action entanglement. 1.2 is good for patients by a medical tort litigation. 1.3 health care workers proposed new and higher requirements, help to promote reform and development of medical institutions. From the burden of proof in medical tort litigation triggered discussion, health care and care from the problems start, find out the reasons and seek countermeasures more. In recent years, various medical institutions, nursing management and actively explore and improve care, and improve various work systems, standardize medical care and behavior and develop nursing standards of writing instruments, strengthen the training o