比较法之路径分析.pdfVIP

2013 年 6 月 三明学院学报 Jun. 2013 第 30 卷第 3 期 JOURNAL OF SANMING UNIVERSITY Vo1.30 No.3 比较法之路径分析 魏哲 (华东政法大学研究生教育院，上海 2∞042) 摘要:长期以来，比较法形成了三种主要研究路径。其一是规则比较，其二是文化比较，其三是功能比较。规则比 较将不同的法律规则进行对比;文化比较则将法律视为文化的一部分，在一个更广阔的视角内进行比较;功能比较是 一种在确定目的的前提下探讨手段的比较方法。这三种比较方法各有其优缺点，应当在运用当中综合使用。然而，必 须首先明确这三者之间的关系。这三者之间是目的与手段的关系。功能比较是一种目的，而规则比较和文化比较则主 要是手段。比较法的研究需要做到目的与手段相结合，求同与求异相结合。 关键词:比较法:功能比较:目的与手段 中图分类号 :D908 文献标识码 :A 文章编号: 1673-4343(2013 )03-0058-05 The Methodology of Comparative Law WEI Zhe (Sc lwol 01 Graduate, East China University 01 Political Sc ience and La:w, S，阳nβai2α刀42 ， China) Abstract: For a long time, comparison method has formed 也ree main research paths. One is the comparison of rule; Second is 由e comparison of the culture; Th让d is the comp缸ison of the function. Comparison of rule comp缸es different legal rules; Comparison of 也e culture views law as a part of cultur哩， comparing within a broader perspective; Functional comparison is a certain objective under 也 e premise of the means of comparative method. The three kinds of comparison methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and should be used comprehensively. However, the relationship 缸nong them must be cl四red at first. Their relationships are the relationship between purpose and means. Functional comparison is a p田pose ， and comparison of rule and cultural comparison is mainly means.ηle study of comp缸ative method need ωdo ∞mbination of purpose and means, combine the seeking 血d dissimilation. Key words: comp缸ison me也od; functional comparison