网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

MRI perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging in comparative study of glioma classification.doc

MRI perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging in comparative study of glioma classification.doc

  1. 1、本文档共17页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
MRI perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging in comparative study of glioma classification

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 17 MRI perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging in comparative study of glioma classification Study: Zou Yan Chong Qin Tai Yang Qi Lu is [Abstract] [Objective] the same group of glioma perfusion and diffusion-weighted MRI image information, compared to the two functional imaging pathological grade of glioma diagnosis. [Method] 42 patients (low-glioma 20 cases, 22 cases of advanced glioma) patients with brain glioma perfusion MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging, measurement of tumor perfusion parameters in real terms and dispersion parameters, the difference between the t test, using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) find the threshold value is determined to calculate sensitivity and specificity. of two diagnostic methods to evaluate and rate of diagnosis? word 2 test. [Results] 20 patients with low-level glioma, 22 patients with advanced glioma. low-level glue stromal tumor rCBV, rMSD, rMTT, ADC and rADC values #8203;#8203;were 2.25 + - 1.07,1.82 + - 0.70,1.07 + - 0.08, (1.36 + - 0.14) 10-3 mm2 s-1 and 1.69 + - 0.23 . Senior glioma rCBV, rMTT, rMSD, ADC and rADC values #8203;#8203;were 4.83 + - 1.84,3.36 + - 0.88,1.04 + - 0.06, (1.10 + - 0.12) 10-3 mm2 s-1 and 1.41 + - 0.18. senior and junior glioma rCBV, rMSD, ADC and rADC values #8203;#8203;were statistically significant. to rCBV value of 3.5 as the threshold value, diagnostic sensitivity was 81.8%, specificity was 90%; rMSD as the threshold value of 2.1 value, diagnostic sensitivity was 95.5%, specificity was 80%; ADC threshold of 1.23 10-3 mm2 / s, the diagnostic sensitivity of 86.4%, specificity was 85%. By the calculation of AUC and hypothesis testing found that PWI and DWI higher diagnostic accuracy, the difference was not statistically significant. [Conclusion] The rCBV values #8203;#8203;of PWI and DWI 3.5, rMSD value of 2.1, ADC value of 1.23 10-3 mm2 s-1 as the threshold value, are conducive to the identification of glioma grade. These thresholds for

文档评论(0)

jiupshaieuk12 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6212135231000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档