Phrenic nerve transfer technique to prevent the application of biofilm clinical study of neural adhesion.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 12 Phrenic nerve transfer technique to prevent the application of biofilm clinical study of neural adhesion Of: leaves, boat, Shiqi Lin, Jiang Xiaoqi, Chen Chen, GU [Abstract] Objective To study the biofilm increase in phrenic nerve transfer to the transplanted musculocutaneous nerve trunk to prevent surgical adhesions of the nerve. Methods A retrospective surgical case of two rows of long-term follow-up data were statistically analyzed . Effective follow-up data in 58 cases, including use of biofilm (experimental group of 27 patients; without biofilm (control group 31 cases. summarize the efficiency of the recovery of the two, the good rate, recovery time, the statistical comparison between the two groups analysis. Results were excellent in 14 cases, good in 8 cases and poor in 5 cases, efficiency 81.48%, good rate of 51.85%. recovery time (8.7 + -2.1 months. the control group were excellent in 8 cases, good in 16 cases and poor in 7 cases, efficiency 77.42%, good rate of 25.81%. recovery time (11.8 + -1.8 months. Conclusion phrenic nerve transfer technique used in Biofilm nerve anastomosis can prevent peripheral nerve adhesion, promoting peripheral nerve regeneration to improve the curative effect and shorten the recovery time. suitable for application in clinical work. [Keywords:] biofilm phrenic nerve plexus Abstract: Objective To evaluate the preventive effect of biofilm on nerve adhesion in the phrenic nerve transfer to musculocutaneous nerve.Methods Retrospective analysis of the long term physical examination data of phrenic nerve transfer was carried out in 58 cases.The nerve anastomosis site was wrapped by biofilm in 27 cases, and the other 31 cases were without biofilm.The treatment outcome was followed and summarized.Results In the group with biofilm, 14 patients had M4, 8 patients had M3 and 5 patients had M2.The effective rate was 81.48% , while the excellent and good rate was 51.85%, the recovery time was (8.7 +-