试论双重含义说下值膜明责任概念的分立.docVIP

本科学年论文 浅议双重含义说下证明责任概念的分立 院 系 政法学院 专业名称 法 学 年级班级 08—1 学生姓名 丁子龙 指导老师 盛 蓓 2010年6月20日 浅议双重含义说下证明责任概念的分立 摘要 多年来，众多学者对证明责任理论展开了深入的研究，相关成果也颇为丰富。但是，在我国证据法理论和教科书中存在着诸多容易与证明责任混淆的概念和说法，且证明责任本身的术语和制度设计上也歧义丛生，在司法实务中对证明责任规范的理解和适用出现诸多自相矛盾的现象。为此，本文通过回顾国外的双重含义说下证明责任概念理论的历史变化，并结合我国从建国以来证明责任理论的发展以及学者们对于证明责任概念的争论，指出证明责任概念问题实质上是如何处理证明责任与举证责任概念上的关联，进而以此为出发点，认为解决证明责任概念混乱的途径就是对行为意义上的证明责任和结果意义上的证明责任在概念术语上彻底分立。 关键词 证明责任概念 双重含义说 分立 Abstract Over the years, many scholars of the burden of proof theoretical study carried out in-depth, relevant results are also quite rich. However, the law of evidence in our theory and the textbooks there are many easily confused with the concept of burden of proof and argument, and the burden of proof design of the systems own terminology and ambiguity is also a widespread practice in the legal burden of proof specification on the understanding and application appear many contradictory phenomenon. Therefore, this article by reviewing the dual meaning of the foreign concept of responsibility to prove that the theory of historical change, combined with China since the founding of the burden of proof from the development of the theory, and scholars to debate the concept of burden of proof, burden of proof that the problem essentially is how the concept of responsibility to deal with the burden of proof to prove the concept of the association, then the starting point to deal with the burden of proof is on the way the concept of chaotic behavior of the sense of responsibility and the results show evidence of the sense of responsibility to completely separate the concept of the term. Key Words:The concept of burden of proof ；The double meaning of that；Discrete 目录  TOC \o 1-3 \h \z \u  HYPERLINK \l _Toc10128 引言  PAGEREF _Toc10128 1  HYPERLINK \l _Toc17075 一、双重含义说  PAGEREF _Toc17075 1  HYPERLINK \l _Toc13589 （一）双重含义说的