Do Low-Mercury Terrestrial Resources Subsidize Low-Mercury Growth of Stream Fish Differences between Species along a Productivity Gradient 英文参考文献.docVIP

下载本文档

4
0
约4.17万字
约 7页
2017-05-11 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Do Low-Mercury Terrestrial Resources Subsidize Low-Mercury Growth of Stream Fish Differences between Species along a Productivity Gradient 英文参考文献.doc

1、本文档共7页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Do Low-Mercury Terrestrial Resources Subsidize Low-Mercury Growth of Stream Fish Differences between Species along a Productivity Gradient 英文参考文献

DoLow-MercuryTerrestrialResourcesSubsidizeLow- MercuryGrowthofStreamFish?Differencesbetween SpeciesalongaProductivityGradient DarrenM.Ward1*¤,KeithH.Nislow2,CarolL.Folt1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America, 2Center for Research on Ecosystem Change, U.S. DepartmentofAgriculture-U.S.ForestService,Amherst,Massachusetts,UnitedStatesofAmerica Abstract Lowproductivityinaquaticecosystemsisassociatedwithreducedindividualgrowthoffishandincreasedconcentrationsof methylmercury(MeHg)infishandtheirprey.However,manystream-dwellingfishspeciescanuseterrestrially-derivedfood resources, potentially subsidizing growth at low-productivity sites, and, because terrestrial resources have lower MeHg concentrationsthanaquaticresources,preventinganincreaseindiet-borneMeHgaccumulation.Weusedalarge-scalefield studytoevaluaterelationshipsamongterrestrialsubsidyuse,growth,andMeHgconcentrationsintwostream-dwellingfish species across an in-stream productivity gradient. We sampled young-of-the-year brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis ) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), potential competitors with similar foraging habits, from 20 study sites in streams in New HampshireandMassachusettsthatencompassedawiderangeofaquaticpreybiomass.Stableisotopeanalysisshowedthat brooktroutusedmoreterrestrialresourcesthanAtlanticsalmon.Overtheirfirstgrowingseason,Atlanticsalmontendedto growlargerthanbrooktroutatsiteswithhighaquaticpreybiomass,butbrookgrewtwo-foldlargerthanAtlanticsalmonat siteswithlowaquaticpreybiomass.TheMeHgconcentrationsofbrooktroutandAtlanticsalmonweresimilaratsiteswith highaquaticpreybiomassandtheMeHgconcentrationsofbothspeciesincreasedatsiteswithlowpreybiomassandhigh MeHg in aquatic prey. However, brook trout had three-fold lower MeHg concentrations than Atlantic salmon at low- productivity, high-MeHg sites. These results suggest that differential use of terrestrial resource subsidies reversed the growthasymmetrybetweenpotential