氧化电位水对Ⅱ度烧伤初期创面清创的效果观察.pdfVIP

10 • 解放军护现杂志 2008 年 5 月 ， 25(5B) 氧化电位水对H 度烧伤初期创丽清创的效果观察 .!.晓波，辜燕，徐琳 (成都市第二人民医院烧伤科，成都 610017) 摘要:阔的 研究氟化电位水(electrolyzed oxidizing water ,EOW)用于 H 度烧伤初期创面清创的效果。方~ 将 60 例患者随机分为实验组与对照缀，各 30 例。实验级烧伤创丽采用 EOW 初期清创，对照组烧伤创丽采 用 10% 聚维酬腆熔液初期清创，比较两组清创效果。结果 两组细雨清除率、伤后时间、回权、深度、致伤原因 比较.差异充统计学意义(P 0. 05); 两组创丽愈合情况比较g 创面结销时间、创缘炎症时间，fllJ 丽愈合时间，实验 组均较对照组缩短，差异有统计学意义(P 0. 05); 两组消创平均成本比较，实验组成本明显低于对照组，经界有 统计学意义( P 0. 05) 。络将 EOW 用于烧伤初期创丽的消创，其功效较 10% 聚维刷碗溶液1!环保、经济、安 全，值得推广。 关键询:氧化电位水;ll 度烧伤创面;初期消创 中图分类号:R644 文献标志码:A 文章编号: 1008-9993(2008)5B-0010-03 Efficacy of Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water on Early Stage Debridement for II 0 Burn Wounds W时~G Xiao-bo , GU Yan , XU Lin(Department of Burn and Plastic Sur伊厅， Chendu No. 2 People s Hospital ,Chengdu 610017 ,China) Abstract:Objective To study the efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing water(EOW) for early stage debridement in n0 burn wounds. Methods Sixty patients with II 0 burn wounds were evenly ran- domized into 2 groups. Patients ín the experimental group receíved EOW for debridement and those in the control group received 10 % Iodophors. 丁he outcomes in the 2 groups were compared. Resu Its There was no difference ín the bacterial c1 earance rate , time after burn wound , area , depth. and the causes of wounds between the 2 groups ( P O. 05). Compared with the control group. experimental group had shorter time of scar forming. trauma margin inflammatory ,and wound healing time( P 0. 0日. The average cost of early stage debridement in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group( P 0.05). Conclusion EOW is better than 10% Iodophors for burn trauma debridement in terms of