- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹部创伤CT诊断与临床价值评估探析
腹部创伤的CT诊断及临床价值评估分析 [摘要] 目的 探究CT诊断法在腹部创伤中的实际应用,并对其临床价值做出准确的评估,以供临床诊断借鉴。方法 随机择取该院于2011年1月―2015年6月接收入院的腹部创伤患者,共计106例作为研究的主要对象。106例患者于入院后,均实施了相应的CT检查,且所有患者也都接受了相应的手术及病理学诊断。将106例患者CT检查的结果作为CT组,手术诊断的结果作为手术组,病理学诊断的结果作为病理学组。对3组的诊断结果进行详细的对比分析,并评估出CT诊断法在腹部创伤中的应用价值。结果 手术组与病理学组均显示,胰腺损伤,共15例;肾脏损伤,共13例;脾脏损伤,共45例;肝脏损伤,共14例;胆道损伤,共11例;血管损伤患者,共2例。而CT组则显示,胰腺损伤,共15例(14.15%);肾脏损伤,共13例(12.26%);脾脏损伤,共51例(48.11%);肝脏损伤,共16例(15.09%);胆道损伤,共11例(10.38%)。以手术及病理学组为标准,CT组确诊患者共104例;误诊患者共2例(1.89%),该2例患者的患病类型本为血管损伤,但被误诊为肝脏损伤。该CT检查的准确率高达98.11%。 结论 将CT诊断法应用于腹部创伤等器官性损伤类疾病的临床诊断中,不仅能显著提升诊断的准确性,还能为腹部创伤患者的临床治疗提供主要依据,具有相当高的临床应用价值
[关键词] 肝脏损伤;CT诊断;脾脏;腹部创伤;临床价值
[中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)12(a)-0177-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the practical application of CT diagnostic method in abdominal trauma and make an accurate assessment of its clinical value in order to provide reference for major medical institutions in China. Methods 106 cases of abdominal trauma patients admitted to our hospital from January 2011 to June 2015 were randomly selected as the main reseach object of this study. After admission, 106 cases were given the corresponding CT inspection, and all patients underwent the corresponding surgery and pathological diagnosis. Of the 106 patients,the results of CT examination were regarded as the CT group, the results of operative diagnosis were regarded as the operation group, and the results of pathological diagnosis were regarded as the pathological group, The diagnostic results of the three groups were compared and analyzed in detail, and the application value of CT diagnosis in abdominal trauma was evaluated. Results Both the operation group and the pathological group showed that 15 cases were pancreatic injury; 13 cases were kidney injury; 45 cases were spleen injury; 14 cases were liver injury; 11 cases were bile duct injury and 2 cases were vascular injury. While the CT group showed that 15 cases were pancreatic injury (14.15%); 13 cases were kidney injury (12.26%);
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- T∕CFIAS 6014-2024 饲料用真菌毒素吸附剂吸附性能的测定方法 体外法.pdf
- 2023年高考语文押题作文:苟且躺平,不如奔向远方.docx VIP
- 低利率时代的资管机构之日本保险篇.docx VIP
- 浅谈歌曲《毕业歌》.doc VIP
- 移动式门式脚手架专项施工方案.docx VIP
- 药企现场质量管理与生产过程控制【优质PPT】43页PPT.ppt VIP
- 新生儿持续肺动脉高压诊疗指南(2025年版).pptx VIP
- 3×36000KVA锰硅合金直流炉1×6300KVA 精炼炉及配套 1×36000KVA富锰渣炉建设项目环评可研资料环境影响.docx VIP
- 《超声波探伤技术》课件.ppt VIP
- 2025广西专业技术人员公需科目培训考试答案(87分);广西“一区两地一园一通道”建设;人工智能时代(1).pdf VIP
文档评论(0)