信任方式的起源和中国人信任的特征.docVIP

信任方式的起源和中国人信任的特征 ?(2011-08-13 10:05:54) 转载▼ 杂谈 DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2010.08.161 ?????????????周生春1??杨缨1,2? （1.浙江大学?经济学院，浙江?杭州?310027；2.九江学院?商学院，?江西?九江332005）? [摘 要]?以往学者大多认为中国社会制度背后的组织通则为亲族原则，并形成了“差序格局”的社会特征，从而造成了中国低信任度的文化，不利于中国的发展。但通过历史分析和博弈推演可知：由于与印度、欧洲不同的起始博弈，中国人建立了基于同情心原则的人格化信任方式——“直接信任”，?这一信任方式虽然在真实性、范围和强度上都优于其他信任方式，但由于辅助的非人格化信任的周期性解体与重建，以及近代社会的转型和外部威胁，中国人的直接信任方式具有不稳定的特点。所以说，中国人对不同对象给予信任的不同顺序与强度是因为安全原因才逐渐表现出来的，中国社会的“差序格局”特征更多的是时间顺序上的，并从时间顺序上反映到空间范围上。 [关键词]?人格化信任；非人格化信任；同情心；亲族 ? Origin of Trust Mode and Characteristic of Chinese Trust Zhou Sheng-chun1?????Yang Ying1,2 (1.????College of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; 2. School of Business, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China) Abstract:?The former scholars usually think that the general principle of social organization behind Chinas social system is the situation-centered sib principle, which has formed the society characteristic of “differential pattern” for a long time. The characteristic has caused Chinese low credibility culture to impede the development of China. A different view is deduced through history analysis and game deduction in the paper: the society characteristic of “differential pattern” in China mainly is based on the time dimension and is mapped into space and relationship from the time dimension. The different culture origins of India, Europe and China resulting from the different start game matrixes formed the different general principles supporting each social organization. “Direct trust”, a Chinese trust mode of personification based on sympathy principle, is superior to other modes in the terms of reality, scope and strength. However, the different confidences Chinese giving to different objects is different only in the strength and priority of confidence gradually showing on safety reasons, whereas Chinese direct trust mode being characterized by instability resulting from lack of the impersonal confidence’s support. Key words:?personal confidence;