牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的国内文献评价和Meta分析.pdfVIP

牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的国内文献评价和Meta分析.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的国内文献评价和Meta分析论文

Traction treatment of cervical spondylotic radicul- opathy literature systematic review and Meta- analysis ABSTRACT Objective: In accordance with the principles of this paper would like to evidence-based medicine. Through the traction treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis systematic review of randomized controlled trials and Meta-analysis. Explore the traction treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis randomized controlled trial status and inadequate to provide some reference for the evaluation of standardized treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis. Methods: In accordance with established search strategies to retrieve electronic retrieval based literature retrieval database includes Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM,1979-2013), China HowNet (CNKI,1979-2013), Chongqing VIP database (VIP, 1989-2013 ), Articles pharmaceutical digital Periodicals (WF,1998-2013).Which includes a masters degree in Chinese HowNet database, database PhD thesis, Chinese Journal Full-text database. The two researchers independently browse topics and abstracts are in the screening obviously does not meet the inclusion criteria of the literature, it is possible to read the full text of the documents to determine whether the documents needed. The researchers screened mutual verification results into the literature, there are differences in the literature on the use of methods or discussion by the first three researchers to judge whether inclusion of the included studies to extract relevant information, the researchers checked by the first three. This study will incorporate the use of literature to develop information collection

文档评论(0)

qianqiana + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5132241303000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档