对于高校贫困生的心理健康状况与应对方式的相关研究 中英文对照.docVIP

对于高校贫困生的心理健康状况与应对方式的相关研究 中英文对照 Research on mental health and coping style of impoverished college students in Chinese and English 运用症状自评量表（SCL-90）与应对方式问卷（CSQ）量表在大学生进行调查获取有效问卷1488份,其中贫困大学生728名，非贫困生760名,分析他们的心理健康状况和应对方式的状况，贫困大学生在恐怖、偏执、强迫、敏感、抑郁、焦虑、精神病性七个因子高于非贫困生，贫困生在外在求助方面也明显低于非贫困生。并对比二者间的关系进行分析，探讨贫困生心理发展与人格特点。 Using the symptom checklist 90 ( SCL-90 ) questionnaire and coping styles (CSQ ) scale investigation and 1488 valid questionnaires were obtained in the college students, including 728 poor students, poor students 760, analysis of mental health status and coping style of their condition, poor college students in terror, paranoid, obsessive, sensitive, depression, anxiety, neurosis seven factor higher than poor students, in the external help is also significantly lower than the non-poor students poor students. Analysis and comparison of the relationship between the two, of poor students psychological development and personality characteristics. 　　【关键词】贫困生 心理健康 应对方式 　 [ keyword ] the poor students psychological coping style 　　1 研究方法与过程 1 research methods and process 　　1.1调查对象 1.1 investigation object 　　选取来自河南省6所高校的本科生为调查对象，抽样比例考虑在校生的男女、年级、专业、生源、籍贯等的实际分布，以使样本结构有充分的代表性。获取有效问卷1488份，其中贫困生728人，非贫困生760人，贫困生和非贫困生在年级、专业等方面无明显统计学差异。 Selected from 6 universities of Henan province undergraduates as the research object, sampling proportion considering the actual distribution of the male and female students, grade, professional, students, place of origin, in order to make the sample structure are fully representative. 1488 valid questionnaires were obtained, of which 728 poor students, 760 people are not poor students, poor students and non-poor students in grade, professional, no statistically significant difference. 　　1.2调查的方法与程序 The method and procedure of 1.2 survey 　　由课题组成员分别与被试所在的学校联系，向被试讲清调查的意义和需要注意的事项，然后由被试根据问卷要求作答，限时45分钟，要求当场回答完所有的问题。 By the members of the project group are respectively connected with the subjects school contact, to make matters were investigate