侵吞公款利息应如何定性 - 110法律咨询网（How should the interest of misappropriating public funds be qualitative - 110 Legal Advisory net）.docVIP

侵吞公款利息应如何定性 - 110法律咨询网（How should the interest of misappropriating public funds be qualitative - 110 Legal Advisory net） How should the interest of misappropriating public funds be qualitative - 110 Legal Consultation Network, consulting lawyers, looking for lawyers, cases, hot provinces: Beijing, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Shandong, Guangdong, Tianjin, Chongqing, Jiangsu, Hunan, Hubei, Sichuan, Henan Hebei 110 Legal advisory network, legal counsel, online legal encyclopedia, my position: 110 nets home database, case analysis, criminal case, criminal defense case view data How should public interest rates be released for embezzlement: 2009-03-17 article source: Internet case: The defendant Lee served as a state-owned power company financial accounting period, using their positions to facilitate, to help his friend Hwang Lanchu, secretly decided to take a power company name, the company has 300 thousand yuan account into Hwang where savings, help Huang complete Lanchu business. Lee will deposit interest income for himself. At a friends party, Huang drank a few cups, accidentally told the matter to liu. Liu and Li Mouyou because of contradictions, Liu reported to the prosecution. Divergence: There are two different opinions in the course of the case. The first view, the accused Li Moushen of financial accounting of state-owned power company, using his position, the unit without authorization will be 300 thousand yuan of funds to help financial institutions to Lanchu, will be of interest for themselves, for the behavior, should be considered for profit-making activities for misappropriation of public funds, embezzlement of public funds. Interest belongs to the illegal gains obtained by misappropriating public funds for profit-making activities, and shall be carried out in accordance with the interpretation of the Supreme Peoples Court on several specific issues concerning the application of law in the trial of cases involving embezzlement of public funds. The second opinion,