公务员逻辑推理练习题3（Civil service logic reasoning exercises 3）.doc

下载文档 降价啦

6
0
约2.33万字
约 23页
2017-07-27 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

公务员逻辑推理练习题3（Civil service logic reasoning exercises 3）.doc

1、本文档共23页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

公务员逻辑推理练习题3（Civil service logic reasoning exercises 3）

公务员逻辑推理练习题3（Civil service logic reasoning exercises 3） 1: environmental scientists in the past 10 years, government investment to protect the wetland is increased by 6 times, but also need such protection of land area increased by only two times (although these areas in 10 years ago has been great). Even taking inflation into account, todays money is at least 3 times as high as it was 10 years ago. Nevertheless, the governments investment in the protection of wetlands is still not enough, and the governments investment should be further increased. Which of the following, if correct, is most helpful in bringing environmental scientists conclusions in line with the cited evidence? A., the government agency responsible for managing wetland conservation, has been mismanaged and inefficient for the past 10 years. B. over the past 10 years, the salaries of scientists who have been hired by the government to protect wetlands have been growing at a rate that is higher than inflation. C.s research in the past 10 years has made todays science a target for conservation before the risk of severe damage to wet land. D. today, more people like scientists and non scientists work on the conservation of natural resources, including wetlands. E. unlike today, 10 years ago, investment in wetland conservation was virtually nonexistent. 2 a murder in a restaurant is investigated: First, murder or use a fork, or use a knife, the two must be in one. Second, murder time, or at 12 in the morning, or 4 in the morning. Third, the murderer, or a, or B, the two must be one of them. If the above is true, which of the following must be true? (1) the victim was not murdered by a fork at 12 in the middle of the night, so the victim was murdered with a knife at 4 a. m.. (2) the victim was murdered at 4 a.m. with a fork, so the victim was not with a fork and made 3966108679 at 4 in the morning Killed. (3) the murder was at 12 in the morning, but not with a fork, so it must have been murdered with a k