7. DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF DIAMOND （7所示。）.pdf

Storms, M.A., Batiza, R., et al., 1993 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, Vol. 142 7. DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF DIAMOND AND ROLLER-CONE BITS 1 G.L. Holloway2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Five different manufacturers contributed to developing drill bits for Leg 142. Even though a considerable amount of effort was put Several new styles of drill bits were designed for the nested drill-in into the design of the new bits, it was recognized that the drill bits bottom-hole assemblies (DI-BHA) deployed during Ocean Drilling were possibly the weakest link of the DI-BHA hardware. Experience Program (ODP) Leg 142 at the East Pacific Rise (EPR). The nested from Legs 106 and 109 provided some guidance; however, the bits DI-BHA required the primary stage collars to have a 7-3/8-in. designed for Leg 142 presented an added complexity in that they not (18.3 cm) bore and the secondary stage drill collars to have a 4.125-in. only needed to hold up to the rigors of hard-rock drilling but had to (10.5 cm) bore. Center bits were designed in conjunction with both bit be designed with large open centers to allow a nested casing string sizes to remove the core as the outer bits were drilled to depth. Two clearance to pass. Discussion of the characteristics of each bit, along sizes of primary stage DI-BHA bits were manufactured: a 12-1/2-in. with field