奇攻妙守划合术(Strange attack and wonderful defence).docVIP

  • 3
  • 0
  • 约1.5万字
  • 约 10页
  • 2017-08-03 发布于河南
  • 举报

奇攻妙守划合术(Strange attack and wonderful defence).doc

奇攻妙守划合术(Strange attack and wonderful defence) .txt Strange attack and wonderful defence And it is always the central problem in the debate, there are attack and defend to the debate of brilliant, odd attack can reflect the wonderful debate is a challenging game, a game of skill, competitive strategy. There are many strategies for offensive and defensive, and I call it tactics of combining tactics. It is a strategic tactic of striking and defending. In order to keep speaking, it refers to mark the logic circle of their own, to build a strong defensive position of the self closing; to attack is concerned, it refers to the well founded rowing, the other row narrow low positions, resulting in a broader and higher level to our conclusion that wide operation and high art. In terms of characteristics, the key to this strategy and tactics is a combination. According to philosophers, harmony reflects and deals with a whole process, which embodies the process of positive, anti -, spiral, rising and forward. It not only points out the issue of debate between the two sides, but in the process of obtaining a higher level of conclusions. In a word, it is a strategy to grasp the whole. Circular self closing technique The minimum and most important requirement of the debate is to justify oneself. This requires both sides to draw a logical circle. Logic design is the core, soul and lifeline of the debate, and is the most important part of the debate. Only their views can be justified, in order to construct the line as strong as iron. Because of this, only every debate team received after the debate the most painful part of logic design: starting point, logic circle. We participated in the second session of the Chinese elite college debate team Jiaotong University as an example, after receiving BianTi almost all suffering from disease logic. Because science and engineering debate on the logic of the integrity of more persistent, higher demands. They do not admit, nor do they allow lo

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档