Midas分析总结（Midas analysis and summary）.docVIP

Midas分析总结（Midas analysis and summary） Midas analysis summary at /viewthread.php? Tid = 3673 1. Lateral computing in Midas. In Midas, the following problems are encountered in horizontal calculation. 1. Load user defined vehicle load, DD, FD, BD all take 1.3 m, P1, P2 as the calculation value, why should the distance of the last item be 0 when input? 2. In the same way, in the same way, in the bridge blog, the negative curving distance of the fulcrum center of the continuous beam was greatly different from that of the other positions. Main parameters: two span 2X7. 5m, bXh = 1.4 x1.2m, P1, P2, 100 The Midas result fulcrum the negative torque - 264.99 kn. M The result support of the bridge has a negative moment - 430kn. M Through several attempts and strong support from MIDAS, the final results are as follows: Sure is loading precision problem, can through the calculation of each beam element influence line points to 6, or, change the length of the beam element to 0.1 meters, can guarantee that is just loaded on this point. The error caused by this accuracy should be acceptable, and if necessary, there is a way. 2. Beam board simulation box girder problem What is the connection between the board and the board unit, the top floor board and the bottom panel? Is it appropriate to do top floor checking with this model? There is an article on the railway bridge design conference album of the railway standards magazine. You can refer to: Iron courtyard, kang xiaoying, analysis of composite cross section In this paper, the composite cross section is used to realize the joint cross section and beam + plate in MIDAS construction stage, and finally the conclusion is that the result of the beam + plate is the internal force of the enlarged plate. There may be similarities to the issues you care about. It is suggested that you can do one of your ideas first, and then verify it! c 3. What is the meaning of the quality conversion in Midas? Is load converted to mass? Online help say