药剂处理对小麦全蚀病防效及其产量因素影响.docVIP

药剂处理对小麦全蚀病防效及其产量因素影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
药剂处理对小麦全蚀病防效及其产量因素影响

药剂处理对小麦全蚀病防效及其产量因素影响摘要:研究结果表明,采用药剂土壤处理和药剂拌种对小麦全蚀病[Gaeumannomyces graminis(Sacc.)ArX& Olivier var. tritici J. Walker]均表现出较好防效,对小麦产量也有明显影响。不同药剂土壤处理与对照相比,次生根受害症状表现推迟8~10 d,剑蚀消、70%甲基托布津和50%多菌灵防效分别为57.4%、32.9%和21.8%,后期枯穗率与对照枯穗率(0.75%)相比,防效分别为72.0%、66.6%和56.0%;产量与对照相比,分别增产31.1%、22.3%和18.6%。不同药剂拌种处理与对照相比,健禾保根部受害症状表现推迟12 d,其他处理推迟16~18 d;通过次生根受害程度调查,综合处理区平均防效达90.6%,3%敌萎丹、2.5%适乐时、12.5%全蚀净、3%敌萎丹+2.5%适乐时、6%立克莠和健禾保等处理平均防效分别为75.7%、51.2%、83.3%、66.4%、81.7%和57.4%;后期枯穗率与对照相比,平均防效依次分别达到85.3%、80.0%、97.3%、78.6%、84.0%和52.0%;产量表现以2.5%适乐时药剂拌种小麦产量最高,12.5%全蚀净处理小麦产量偏低。 关键词:药剂处理;小麦全蚀病[Gaeumannomyces graminis(Sacc.)ArX & Olivier var. tritici J. Walker];防效;产量因素 中图分类号:S435.12 文献标识码:A 文章编号:0439-8114(2012)16-3483-02 Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor LIU Wei-guo (Shangqiu Plant Protection and Quarantine Station in Henan Province,Shangqiu 476000,Henan,China) Abstract: Chemical soil treatment and seed dressing had a good control effect on wheat take-all and also could affect the wheat yield. Different chemical soil treatments, like Jianshixiao, 70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim, could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group, and the control effects of them were 57.4%, 32.9%, 21.8% respectively; their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%, 66.6%, 56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%; the yield increased 31.1%, 22.3%, 18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group. Compared with the control group, Jianhebao could delay damage symptoms of roots 12 days, while other seed dressing methods could delay 16~18 days; the research on the damage degree of the secondary roots indicated that the average control effect was 90.6% in the comprehensive treatment area, and the average control effects of 3% Dividend, 2.5% Celest, 12.5% Latitude, 3% Dividend with 2.5% Celest, 6% Raxil or Jianhebao were 75.7%, 51.2%, 83.3%, 66.4%, 81.7%, 57.4% r

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档