有效场论effectivefieldtheory-indico.ppt

Kao, Chung-Wen 高崇文 Chung Yuan Christian University 臺灣中原大學 How to extract Fragmentation functions? SIDIS off deuteron target SIDIS using deuteron target SIDIS using deuteron target SIDIS using deuteron target Constrains on A and B HERMES Data of Pion multiplicity Choices of FFs HERMES Kaon Data Inclusion of error bar Inclusion of error bar Including the error bar Inclusion of error bar Is there inconsistency? To make sense of our result, we try to figure out the best values of DQ and DS to fit the HERMES data. If we assume the values of DQ and DS are not sensitive to Q2 then we only need to plug in PDFs S(x) and Q(x) then we should decide the values of DQ and DS . Best fit values of DQ and DS Best fit values of DQ and DS Best fit values of DQ and DS Can CSB explain inconsistency? Can CSB explain inconsistency? Conclusion To be consistent with HERMES data, the u quark is more likely to fragment to pion rather than kaon. S(x)/Q(x) derived from pion and kaon multiplicity of SIDIS are not consistent with the one from PDFs. None of fragmentation functions can be used to extract PDFs from HERMES data consistently in the LO analysis. CSB is unlikely to explain this problem! Outlook: NLO analysis Thank you for your attention HKNS (LO) HKNS (NLO) DSS (LO) DSS (NLO) 5.NJL-Jet Model 6.Nonlocal Chiral Quark Model 7.AKK08 HKNS (LO) HKNS (NLO) DSS (LO) DSS (NLO) 5.NJL-Jet Model 6.Nonlocal Chiral Quark Model 7.AKK08 HKNS (LO) HKNS (NLO) DSS (LO) DSS (NLO) 5.NJL-Jet Model 6.Nonlocal Chiral Quark Model 7.AKK08 HKNS (LO) HKNS (NLO) DSS (LO) DSS (NLO) 5.NJL-Jet Model 6.Nonlocal Chiral Quark Model 7.AKK08 DQDS! M.Stolarski (COMPASS Collaboration), in SPIN2014, 21st International Symposium on Spin Physics, Beijing, October 19–24, 2014 DSK0! DKQ DKS Can CSB explain inconsistency? Assume * * Kaon and Pion Fragmentation functions and SIDIS off deuteron 2016/7/26 Menu 2016 p: proton, n: neutron Charge Conjugation Assume PDFs are charge symmetric: DQDS Since S(x)0,