锁定加压接骨板结合微创经皮钢板内固定技术与交锁髓内钉治疗老年性胫骨中下段骨折.docVIP

锁定加压接骨板结合微创经皮钢板内固定技术与交锁髓内钉治疗老年性胫骨中下段骨折.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
锁定加压接骨板结合微创经皮钢板内固定技术与交锁髓内钉治疗老年性胫骨中下段骨折

锁定加压接骨板结合微创经皮钢板内固定技术与交锁髓内钉 治疗老年性胫骨中下段骨折 张志新,周君东,陈兴阳,邵 磊(常州市德安医院,江苏省常州市 213000) 引用本文:张志新,周君东,陈兴阳,邵磊. 锁定加压接骨板结合微创经皮钢板内固定技术与交锁髓内钉治疗老年性胫骨中下段骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21():2378-2382. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2017.15.015 ORCID: 0000-0001-7338-6352(张志新) 文章快速阅读: 文题释义: 微创经皮钢板内固定技术:该技术的核心是避免直接暴露骨折端,维持适当稳定的固定,最大程度的保护骨断端以及周围的血供,为骨折愈合、软组织修复提供良好的生物学环境,且微创经皮钢板内固定技术经皮操作对骨折部位干扰小,极大地降低植骨率,减少了骨不连的发生。 AOFAS(American orthopedic foot and ankle society)踝后足评分:minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis,MIPO Locking compression plate combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation versus intramedullary interlocking nailing for senile distal tibia fractures Zhang Zhi-xin, Zhou Jun-dong, Chen Xing-yang, Shao Lei (Changzhou Dean Hospital, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu Province, China) Abstract BACKGROUND: In the treatment of senile distal tibia fractures, locking compression plate (LCP) combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) exerts a satisfactory repair effect, and contributes to the function recovery of lower limbs. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy of LCP combined with MIPO versus intramedullary interlocking nailing for senile distal tibia fractures. METHODS: Fifty-six elderly patients with distal tibia fracture were allotted to minimally invasive and intramedullary nailing groups (n=28 per group), and received the treatment of LCP combined with MIPO and intramedullary interlocking nailing fixation, respectively. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative AOFAS ankle-hind foot scale scores, postoperative ambulation time, healing time, postoperative complications and the excellent and good rate in Johner-Wruhs’ criteria were compared between two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The operation time, AOFAS ankle-hind foot scale scores, ambulation time, and healing time in the minimally invasive group were significantly superior to those in the intramedullary nailing group (P 0.05). (2) The mi

文档评论(0)

shenlan118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档