强脉冲光对人体不同部位脱毛疗效比较.docVIP

强脉冲光对人体不同部位脱毛疗效比较.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
强脉冲光对人体不同部位脱毛疗效比较

强脉冲光对人体不同部位脱毛疗效比较[摘要]目的:评价强脉冲光对人体不同部位脱毛的疗效。方法:利用强脉冲光脱毛287例(318个部位),回顾性分析其脱毛情况。结果:腮部和唇周5次脱毛后,脱毛率分别与其他各组之间两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);而腮部和唇周之间,以及其他各组之间两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腮部和唇周总脱毛次数较多,平均分别为8.21次和8.07次,次数多于其余各部位,效果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余各组之间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腋窝、四肢、骶部各组治疗总有效率均为100%,唇毛的有效率最低,发际和腮部的总有效率次之。总不良反应发生率为8.04%。结论:强脉冲光脱毛疗效稳定,不良反应发生率低,但不同部位脱毛效果不同,对四肢、腋窝、发际脱毛效果较好,疗效优于唇周和腮部。 [关键词]强脉冲光子;脱毛;部位;疗效 [中图分类号]R758.71 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1008-6455(2008)10-1503-03 The comparison of the curative effect of intense pulsed light in hair removal of human different area of the body YIN Rui,LIN Lin,XIAO Yan,HAO Fei (Department of Dermatology,Southwest Hospital,the Third Military Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China) Abstract:ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of intense pulsed light on hair removal of human different areas of the body. MethodsThe human different areas of 287 cases were depilated by intense pulsed light. A total of 318 sites with the efficacy of hair removal were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsAfter 5 treatments,there were significant differences between the percentage of depilation ofwhisker and lip groups and others of seven groups(P0.05).The total treatment times of whisker and lip were 8.21 and 8.07 respectively,and the times were fewer than those in the rest of groups.There were significant difference between each of the last two groups and each of the first seven groups(P0.05).The curative efficiency of lips was the lowest.Whisker and hairline take second place. The curative efficiency of others of the seven groups were 100%.The percentage of adverse reaction was 8.04%.ConclusionsHair removal by intense pulsed light has steady effect.The occurrence of severe adverse reaction is lower. Due to different areas of the body,the curative efficiency of permanent hair removal by intense pulsed light are different. The curative efficiency of limb,axillas and hairline are better than whisker and lip. Key words:intense pulsed light;hair removal;area;cura

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档