白内障手术是复明还是失明（Cataract surgery is fuming or blindness）.docVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约5.04千字
约 4页
2017-09-02 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

白内障手术是复明还是失明（Cataract surgery is fuming or blindness）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

白内障手术是复明还是失明（Cataract surgery is fuming or blindness）

白内障手术是复明还是失明（Cataract surgery is fuming or blindness） Observation is not fine, it is a lesson to be learned The conclusion is not enough for medical malpractice. After identification, I think the show is still false medical records. In March 15th 99, I filed an administrative lawsuit against the court of Haizhou District of Fuxin, asking for the identification of the authenticity of the case, and the court refused to accept it. Then, in April 99, 4, the provincial health department to apply for re identification. In September 8th 99, the expert appraisal at the meeting with a medical record in the province said appraisal meeting: for the identification of experts, from the medical records do not see patients with surgery, the recovery of visual acuity after surgery, healing of incision, was discharged from the hospital in what circumstances, even a summary is not, in the case of what is invisible. The expert asked again, have I seen the medical record? I said, no, they wont let me see. This medical record is false.. The expert asks me again: did you go through the discharge formalities? I said, no!. At this time, the president of light hospital, but said, and I have an agreement, has given me 5000 yuan. I was startled, what 5000 yuan of money? Who gave the money to? I received the identification of medical malpractice identification book in November 16th, the book said: the experts reviewed the relevant detailed pathography, listened carefully to the statements of both doctors and patients were fully discussed, identification of experts opinions as follows: 1) the diagnosis is correct, the treatment principle is not wrong (what is the principle?) 2) in 1989, the first operation, under local anesthesia, the lens extraction in the pack, has operation indication (where is the operation indication?) 3) iris detachment occurred 4 years after surgery, which is a complication after cataract surgery; 4) conclusion: it does not constitute medical malpractice. The identificat