explore the interpretation of cross-cultural pragmatic failure（探索跨文化语用失误的解释）.docVIP

下载本文档

9
0
约1.63万字
约 15页
2017-09-06 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

explore the interpretation of cross-cultural pragmatic failure（探索跨文化语用失误的解释）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

explore the interpretation of cross-cultural pragmatic failure（探索跨文化语用失误的解释）

Explore the interpretation of cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure Abstract: The interpretation is a face to face cross-cultural communication activities, understanding and to avoid cross-cultural pragmatic failure has on the interpretation of particular importance for this paper to pragmatics pragmatic failure theory, analysis of interpretation often arise pragmatic failures that language use - language errors and social - pragmatic failures, the exchange process to reduce misunderstandings, facilitate communication. Keywords:: pragmatic failures language - language failures social - pragmatic failure Abstract Guided by the theory of ‘pragmatic failure’ proposed by Thomas (1983), this paper digs into the pragmatic failures committed in interpretation. It is suggested in this article that pragma-linguistic and sociopragmatic failures should be avoided so as to facilitate cross- cultural communication. Keywords: pragmatic failure pragma-linguistic failure socio-pragmatic failure Thomas (1983) said that, in verbal communication, speaking the language of English-speaking habits of this tribe, and other misuse of the English people did not encode mode according to the standard syntax of words and sentences him to apply the Chinese way of expression or the expression of structure, etc. Social - at best be considered ‘not good’ (speaking badly); but the language refers to communication failures due to not understand or ignored if there is no communication of both handle in accordance with pragmatic principles of discourse, he would be considered social , differences in cultural background, the emergence of language errors. As ‘poor performance’ (behaving badly), it is considered the identity of the parties with communication, communicative language domain, the topic of the familiar ‘bad faith, intentionally deceptive or ill-intentioned people’, it can be other factors For this distinction between two types of pragmatic failure can lead to cross-cultural comm