on site supervision of the debate and thinking（现场监督的讨论和思考）.docVIP

On site supervision of the debate and thinking Abstract The water encountered during construction supervision on site supervision of the debate, and then from the theory, practice and institutional aspects of site supervision in the construction supervision role and their status are discussed. Keywords construction supervision; site supervision; controversy; thinking Along with the construction management system reform, the construction supervision system has entered the implementation stage, but these years, the construction supervision of the parties in the construction of the role, responsibilities and obligations of supervising engineers, both in theory and practice different interpretations and practices, especially the issue of site supervision, in particular, debate and argument than [1-4]. 1 site supervision of the controversy 1.1 The owners of the site supervision requirements Usually the owners requires supervisors to have Supervision Engineer qualification, require supervision during construction engineers in the construction unit, with all or most of the time and effort of the whole process of construction activity tracking and monitoring. Some owners have even asked the supervising engineer of the construction of each process Each unit works to track supervision, such as the construction of this unit is a responsibility of the construction layout measurements require independent supervision should also be re-measured, as approved by the construction unit of measurement results, the cross-section excavation, concrete pouring, etc. should be attendant jobs, especially in the ‘98 flood,’ a ‘rubbish’ project, the project quality issues have been unprecedented attention to the community, so the owners of the site supervision is emphasized for me. 1.2 Supervisor’s understanding of the construction site supervision Supervisor that the supervision is high intelligence services, not full-time stand-by institutions, supervising engi