on the depth of the cultural quality education programs to promote the building of the university of thinking（深度的文化素质教育,促进大学的建筑思想）.docVIP

On the depth of the cultural quality education programs to promote the building of the University of thinking Paper Keywords: cultural quality of the education system to generate guiding mechanism means teaching the course structure Abstract: At present, the cultural quality of university education system to build the building in science and rationality, individual courses with matching mechanism with adaptive developmental needs, teaching innovation and effectiveness, etc., with the cultural quality of the Educational objectives and requirements are still some distance. as soon as possible from the course set up and manage the operation of the basic form of construction, turned to the quality and effectiveness of attention and pursuit the goal of building needs in the new guidelines, is committed to generate ways to improve curriculum, structural layout optimization of curriculum resources, curriculum and elective courses to guide the establishment of mechanisms operating mode of teaching reform and innovation. The quality of education our universities and cultural construction of more than ten years of exploration, we have achieved initial results, although colleges and universities in the subjects set, the concept of generic classification and the use of different, but the diversity of curriculum, course management routine has gradually a culture of quality education system construction and operation of the common features, but on the whole, the quality of university culture still in the education curriculum development and curriculum management structures forming stage, curriculum development concerns are mostly concentrated in the curriculum Set the type and quantity of courses and course credits offered in the form of management, and in the curriculum to build the scientific and rational, curriculum matching mechanism with the developmental needs with personalized adaptive, innovative curriculum and teaching model effectiveness, etc., are still the