妇产科医学剖宫产术腹腔内与腹腔外缝合子宫切口两种方式的比较-论文(Comparison of two methods of abdominal incision and abdominal incision for cesarean section in obstetrics and Gynecology).docVIP

  • 2
  • 0
  • 约6.1千字
  • 约 6页
  • 2017-09-08 发布于河南
  • 举报

妇产科医学剖宫产术腹腔内与腹腔外缝合子宫切口两种方式的比较-论文(Comparison of two methods of abdominal incision and abdominal incision for cesarean section in obstetrics and Gynecology).doc

妇产科医学剖宫产术腹腔内与腹腔外缝合子宫切口两种方式的比较-论文(Comparison of two methods of abdominal incision and abdominal incision for cesarean section in obstetrics and Gynecology)

妇产科医学剖宫产术腹腔内与腹腔外缝合子宫切口两种方式的比较-论文(Comparison of two methods of abdominal incision and abdominal incision for cesarean section in obstetrics and Gynecology) The text of Obstetrics and Gynecology Comparison of two methods of abdominal incision and abdominal incision in cesarean section [Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical value of abdominal incision in cesarean section. Method Cesarean section abdominal uterine incision suture in 193 cases (group 1) and cesarean section intraoperative intraperitoneal uterine incision suture (group 2) 454 cases, two groups of operation time, intraopera

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档