- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
老年人急性冠脉综合征介入治疗
老年人急性冠脉综合征介入治疗
【摘要】 目的: 评价老年急性冠脉综合征病人(GACS)接受介入治疗的条件、并发症和近远期效果。方法: 分析1999年1月至2000年12月住院的GACS病人86例,分为早期介入治疗组26例(30.2%,住院3天内);择期介入治疗组28例(32.6%,住院3天至2周);药物治疗组32例(37.2%,C组)。比较3组病人的下列参数:年龄、病史、病重程度、IABP使用率、介入并发症、住院并发症、病死率、住院时间、随访资料(包括再住院率、病死率、介入治疗和搭桥率)。结果: 3组病人的年龄和病史基本相同(Pgt;0.05)。介入治疗组的病重程度、IABP使用率明显大于药物治疗组(Plt;0.05);住院病死率、住院时间、再住院率、随访病死率、随访介入治疗和搭桥率明显低于药物治疗组(Plt;0.05)。早期介入治疗组的病重程度和1ABP使用率明显大于择期介入治疗组(Plt;0.05),但两组的操作并发症、住院并发症和病死率无差别(Pgt;0.05)。结论: ①介入治疗能明显降低老年危重GACS病人的住院病死率和并发症,缩短住院时间,改善随访结果;②早期介入治疗是处理GACS危重症的有效方法;③提高GACS危重病人的介入治疗率是改善其整体预后的重要措施。
【关键词】 老年人急性冠脉综合征 介入治疗
The Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization on
Geriatric Acute Coronary Syndrome
Abstract Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the using indication, complication, immediate and longterm effect of percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR) in geriatric patients with acute coronary syndrome (GACS). Methods: Consecutive 86 GACS patients were admitted from Jan. of 1999 to Dec. of 2000. They were divided into three groups of ① early PCR group (PCR was conducted within 3 days after admission, 26 cases, 30.2%); ② elective PCR group (PCR was completed in 3 days to 2 weeks after admission, 28 cases, 32.6%); ③ medication group (32 cases, 37.2%). Following parameters were compared between 3 groups: age, history, sickness degree, IABP rate, PCR complication, total complication, mortality, hospital time, fellowup data including readmission rate, fellowup mortality, reCABG or PCI rate. Results: The age and history were comparable among 3 groups (Pgt;0.05). The sickness degree and IABP rate in two PCR groups were obviously higher than those in the medication group (Plt;0.05), but the word mortality, hospitalization time, readmission rate, followup mortality, reCABG or PCR rate were significantly lower than those in medication group (Plt;0.05). However, the procedure complication, total complication and mortality were similar between two PCR groups. Conclusions:① PCR could significa
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 湖南省建筑工程劳动量定额、时间定额和主要施工机械台班产量定额.docx VIP
- 2024年四川省绵阳市中考数学真题卷(含答案与解析).pdf VIP
- 高处作业吊篮施工安全生产隐患识别图集.pptx
- 02S515排水检查井图集.docx VIP
- (46)--6.2.6 季胺碱的生成与霍夫曼消除反应.ppt
- 申瓯SOB-V600矢量变频器说明书.pdf
- (二模)石家庄市2025年高三教学质量检测(二)数学试题卷(含标准答案).pdf
- TGDSS002-2018不锈钢管及双卡压式管件.pdf
- 电子邮件地址注册-邮件守门员.PDF VIP
- 2025年中国工业自动化控制系统市场前景预测及未来发展趋势报告.docx
文档评论(0)