高校教师教学质量评价体系的研究与实践必备.PDFVIP

20 11 1 高 等教 育 研 究 an. , 20 10 32 1 our nal of H igher Education V ol. 32 No. 1 * 徐薇薇, 吴建成, 蒋必彪, 龚方红 ( 常州大学, 江苏 常州213164) : 高校教师教学质量评价指标体系应突 整体性导向性和直观性; 各指标权重应 采用层次分析法进行确定, 相对于T L Saaty 的9 分位标度法和 1. 354 的标度法, 采用黄 金分割0. 618 作为标度的层次分析法, 可避免各指标间权重差异过大或过小情况的发生评 价数据的获取应有足够的主体样本以确保较高的可信度, 评价数据的处理应包括数据分析数 据截断和数据剔除 : 教师教学质量; 评价指标体系; 黄金分割标度; 层次分析法 : G642. 0 : A : 1000-4203( 2011) 01-0100-04 Research on the Evaluation System of Teaching Quality and Its Practice XU We-i w ei, WU ian-cheng, IANG B-i biao, GONG Fang-ho ng ( Changz hou Un iv er sity , Changz hou 2 13 164, Ch ina) Abstract : The indicator system of teaching quality evaluation for higher educatio n insti- tutions should fo cus on integrity, dir ectiv ity and intuitiveness; w eighting coeff icient should be decided through analy tical hierarchy process. Comparing w ith nine-stag e scale of T . L . Saaty and 1. 354 scale, adopting 0. 618 g olden section scale as the analy tical hierarchy process could av oid such situatio n that the w eighting divergence differ larg ely or little. When gather- ing data, enough body samples could ensure the credibility. And data analysis, data trunca- tion and data r ejection are the necessary steps of data processing . Key words: teaching quality; sy stem of evaluating indicator; g olden section scale; ana- lytical hierarchy process; data analy sis , , , , , , , , , * : 20 10- 10- 14 : ( 1965- ) , , , , , ;