- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
异丙酚对体外循环肺损伤保护作用
异丙酚对体外循环肺损伤保护作用
作者:许艳荣,徐凯智,卢家凯,卿恩明
【摘要】 目的研究临床剂量异丙酚对体外循环(Extracorporeal circulation,ECC)氧自由基所致的肺损伤是否有保护作用。方法选择择期30例首次心脏瓣膜置换术患者并随机分为对照组(C组)和异丙酚组(P组),每组15例。于ECC前(T1)、腔静脉开放5 min(T2)、30 min(T3)、60 min(T4)时测定桡动脉血超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、丙二醛(MDA)浓度,计算胸肺顺应性(Cs)和动态肺顺应性(Cd),呼吸指数(RI)。结果C组Cs、Cd在T2,T3,T4较T1及同时间点的P组明显下降(Plt;0.05),C组RI在T2,T3较T1及同时间点的P组明显升高(Plt;0.05),T4与T1无明显差异但仍高于P组。C组SOD T2,T3,T4显著低于P组(Plt;0.05),MDA显著高于P组(Plt;0.05)。T2,T3,T4两组MDA显著高于T1(Plt;0.05),但是P组升高的程度不如C组。结论临床剂量的异丙酚可能通过减少ECC氧自由基产生,增加机体清除氧自由基的能力,从而减轻ECC所致的肺脏缺血/再灌注损伤。
【关键词】 异丙酚;体外循环;氧自由基;肺脏;缺血/再灌注损伤
Protective Effect of Clinical Dose Propofol on Pulmonary Injury Induced by Extracorporeal Circulation
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To study the protective effect of clinical dose propofol on pulmonary injury induced by extracorporeal circulation(ECC). METHODSThirty patients undergoing cardiac value replacement for the first time were randomly divided into two group: control group (Group C,15 patients ) and propofol group (Group P,15 patients ). Pulmonary thoracic compliance (Cs),dynamic compliance (Cd) and respiratory indexes (RI) were calculated at pre-ECC(T1),5minutes(T2),30minutes(T3),60minutes(T4) after vena cava declamping. At the same time points arterial blood samples were taken for determination of SOD, MDA concentrations. RESULTSThere was a significant decrease of Cs and Cd at T2,T3,T4 in the group C as compared with basline values and the values of the group P respectively (Plt;0.05). The RI of the group C at T2, T3was higher than either their baseline or the values of the group P at the same measure points (Plt;0.05). Though there was no significant difference between at T4 and T1 in the group C (Plt;0.05),the values of the group C were higher than those of the group P at T4 (Plt;0.05). SOD concentration was significantly lower at T2,T3,T4 in the group C than T1 and the values of the group P respectively. There was a significant increased of MDA concentration at T2,T3,T4 in the group C and the group P than T1, but the
文档评论(0)