语文论文语文课应该教成人课_4398（Chinese papers and Chinese lessons should be taught as peoples lessons _4398）.docVIP

语文论文语文课应该教成人课_4398（Chinese papers and Chinese lessons should be taught as peoples lessons _4398） Chinese lessons should be taught as people lessons (Anhui / Wang Nansong) Reflections on deepening the reform of Chinese teaching in Middle Schools One In March 16, 1978, Mr. Lv Shuxiang published the two urgent questions in the current Chinese language teaching in the peoples daily, which opened the prelude to the reform of Chinese language education in the new period. In 19 years, only the middle school Chinese teachers, join the teaching practice is not under the hundreds of thousands, although there has been some valuable experience, created some Chinese educational experts, the emergence of a number of Chinese education rookie, but generally speaking, Mr. Lu introduced 19 years ago the Chinese teaching of low efficiency the problem has not been solved. Once a year the college entrance examination, but the actual difficulty of Chinese medium, but the per capita losing rate is often most subjects of the measurement system. Most of the candidates can not read papers on the simple classical Chinese and modern Chinese ordinary, not according to the requirements, the composition of the small body material conception, layout and conscious use of language, even in the face of repeated training knowledge choice often with divination lucky. How is the quality of Chinese language teaching so unsatisfactory? The reason will find hundreds of articles, but in the final analysis, it is still unclear about the nature of the subject, the purpose of teaching and the task. Over the past ten years, the Chinese educational circles have not been able to solve the question of the principles of the reform of Chinese language education. At first, the authority was not...... Must not...... The warning, let a person be scared, be at a loss what to do. According to the recent introduction of Mr. Zhuang Wenzhong, about the nature of Chinese view of monism, dualism and pluralism of all that; Mr.