语法[が]和[は]的用法（Syntax [] [], and is.）.docVIP

语法[が]和[は]的用法（Syntax [] [], and is.） , and is the use of Originally, and WA usage is at the beginning stage of primary Japanese learning, should belong to the primary Japanese content. However, after summarizing all the grammar of Japanese, once again sorting out the two auxiliary words, the knowledge involved is already very extensive. Therefore, the problem is classified into intermediate Japanese and divided into several sections. 1, the different definitions of the two auxiliary words Because in the sentence, and is often in a similar position, some people mistakenly think that this is not the difference between the two words. What does not know, the two from the auxiliary type is not the same type. Ga is a nominative, case auxiliary words; and WA is a reminder that the particle, it can not only indicate the subject, object, adverbial can also suggest that, under certain conditions can also prompt complement. Therefore, they can sometimes play a similar role, but sometimes they are quite different. 2, different meanings in the question of subject and predicate Please look at the following two example sentences (the judgment sentence): A: Im in the classroom was. B: I was in the classroom, in advance. These two sentences translated into Chinese are here is the classroom.. But there are different meanings in japanese. The phrase a means that this place is a classroom, not any other room, such as a teachers room or a laboratory, etc.. The answer was: is, I was in advance. (where is this?) What is or was I was in advance of Ka (which is what room?) Problem. In other words, the answer to the question of the predicate has already been known. B sentence is to emphasize, only this is the classroom, other is not the classroom, such as: next to or opposite is not the classroom. The answer is , I was in the classroom. (where is the classroom?) Problem. That is to say, when the predicate is known, the answer to the subjects question is answered. Why is it such a differe