z理论的内涵以及常见的误解(The connotation of Z theory and its common misunderstandings).docVIP

z理论的内涵以及常见的误解(The connotation of Z theory and its common misunderstandings).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
z理论的内涵以及常见的误解(The connotation of Z theory and its common misunderstandings)

z理论的内涵以及常见的误解(The connotation of Z theory and its common misunderstandings) The theory of Z put forward by William Dane actually belongs to the category of organizational theory. Although a great deal of cultural discourse was used when writing the book, it was by no means a mere cultural treatise. From the line of study, rather than the way Benedict (this is the typical form of Cultural Anthropology), he is the Max Webb method (which is the typical form of sociology). It is not dispensable to point out the academic contribution of the university. Because from the perspective of organizational theory, Webb is a orthodox approach to organizational theory, while Benedicts approach is the orthodox cultural theory. In the large, the Japanese style management is summarized and summarized, and the Z theory is put forward. In his book, American management is very different from Japanese management. However, with this kind of inductive method, a little carelessness may lead to mistakes. The company itself acknowledges that any model approach is likely to be simplistic. Model analysis is very difficult to model. The reason is that if there is no real simplified model variables will be very complex, and complex to measure; and if simplified too much, it will deviate from the reality, even reduced to work with reality does not match the paper. From the point of view of experience and common sense, it is more accurate to generalize the characteristics of Japanese enterprises. But his generalizations about American companies are accurate and worth reviewing. Because in his book, the description of American business is far from elaborate on the description of Japanese enterprises, he asserts that in all important respects, the American model is diametrically opposed to the Japanese model (P42). Is it really the opposite? Lets start with the most important length of employment. On the face of it, the United States is indeed a short-term employment system. Coles findings from the U

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档