保险学重点案例及分析2(Key cases and analysis of insurance 2).docVIP

保险学重点案例及分析2(Key cases and analysis of insurance 2).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
保险学重点案例及分析2(Key cases and analysis of insurance 2)

保险学重点案例及分析2(Key cases and analysis of insurance 2) Key cases and analysis of insurance Author: Gu Zhantao (turn) posted from: site original hits: 0, article entry: kfjy1 1. a lessee leases his house on the landlord for 10 months. The lease contract states that the lessee shall be liable for the damage of the house during the lease term, and the lessee shall insure the fire insurance for a year for the purpose of renting the house. Upon completion of the lease, the tenant checks out on time. In the second half of the month, the house was destroyed by fire. Therefore, the lessee claims to the insurance company in the identity of the insured. Is the insurer liable for damages? Why? If the lessee transfers the policy to the landlord when checking out, can the landlord claim compensation from the insurance company in the capacity of the insured? Why? (1) the insurer is not liable for compensation. Because the lessee has no insurable interest in the house. (2) the landlord cannot claim for the identity of the insured. Since the policy transfer has not been approved by the insurer, the landlord has no insurance relationship with the insurer. 2., a bank for fire insurance, additional theft insurance, in the insurance policy written on 24 hours, there are guards on duty, the insurance company to be insured, and as a condition for reducing costs. After the bank was stolen, the investigation, 24 hours an hour, half an hour, the guard is not on duty. Is the insurance company liable for damages? The insurance company is not liable for damages. Because the bank violated the warranty (or warranty, or the principle of utmost good faith, and guarantee) is a part of the insurance contract, breach of warranty, it means a breach, the insurer may terminate the insurance contract, the insurance contract shall be invalid or announced, in the event of insurance that does not bear the liability to pay the insurance money. 3., a hotel for fire insurance, additional theft insurance, in the in

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档