iphone5的工业设计(Industrial design of iphone5).docVIP

iphone5的工业设计(Industrial design of iphone5).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
iphone5的工业设计(Industrial design of iphone5)

iphone5的工业设计(Industrial design of iphone5) What is the innovation in industrial design, it seems difficult to answer, because the industrial design is the basic technology and means, but think about it, to say iPhone 5 what innovation is not about the answer to the question, now see the Chinese news headlines are refers to the lack of innovation, I think that there are a lot of people are keen to discuss if Apple had to do what the TV, if the Steve Jobs innovation will happen, do what the car, do the toilet. Note 1: I see the question is what are the innovations and shortcomings? I am going to answer this question, talk and lack. Note 2: the following discussion may be a bit abstract. If you want to see a direct answer to the question, slide directly to the next text plus black. I would like to stand in the utilitarian point of view, iPhone is an article, is a commodity, but also a symbol of the era of consumerism goods. The so-called era of consumerism symbolic commodity is the item (iPhone) and (Apple) brand value in a large part is produced by consumer awareness and communication, popular point that may be so, I said that the iPhone 5 is good, then the value of iPhone 5 increased a. But the so-called utilitarian angle is to help understand the existence of the goods (Context), it can not enter the interpretation system made of goods. Simply speaking, it helps to understand the complexity of goods or goods, but complexity does not justify the quality of the goods. For example, some people say this product design of Apple is very bad, and I went to investigate the complexity of product design, to investigate the formation process, get an explanation, but this explanation cannot be directly used for evaluation, or to forgive the bad design. This conference has three hardware products, I feel optimistic than most people, I think iPod touch iPod nano also believes that good good, I understand the necessity of iPod nano under the white plastic, in order to wireless sig

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档