- 9
- 0
- 约9.43千字
- 约 56页
- 2017-11-13 发布于浙江
- 举报
3. Lecture exemple THREE METHODS OF SERVICE DEPARTMENT ALLOCATION DIRECT METHOD The simplest and most widely used method. Allocates all service department costs to production departments ONLY. DIRECT METHOD The direct method is assuming (though this is NOT reality) that the use of the service departments is: A: ignore 40 used by B, therefore total use = 160 (100+60) B: ignore 150 used by A, therefore total use = 150 (30+120) DIRECT METHOD STEP DOWN METHOD THREE METHODS OF SERVICE DEPARTMENT ALLOCATION STEP DOWN METHOD “Once SD costs are allocated out, you cannot allocate them back in” Firms must choose the order in which to allocate SD costs, like: Cost/The number of other SDs service/The percentage of time spent servicing other SDs, etc. STEP DOWN METHOD For the lecture example, because B is allocated first : B: 150 + 30 + 120 = 300 A: ignore 40 used by B, because costs have been allocated out of B, so can’t allocate back in, therefore = 160 (100+60) STEP DOWN METHOD STEP DOWN METHOD QUESTION: If A had been allocated first, what would be happen ? RECIPROCAL SERVICES METHOD THREE METHODS OF SERVICE DEPARTMENT ALLOCATION RECIPROCAL SERVICES METHOD (cf.P88) (1) Calculate the total amount of costs for each service department, and then (2) Allocate the SD costs into PDs. Step1: Let A = total cost of A, and B = total cost of B. The relationships are:? A uses 150/300, i.e. 50%, of B B uses 40/200, i.e. 20%, of A Set the costs up as simultaneous equations: A = $10,000 + .5B ..... (i) A=$13,333 B = $4,000 + .2A ....... (ii) B=$6,667 RECIPROCAL SERVICES METHOD Step 2: RECIPROCAL SERVICES METHOD USING BILLING RATES Calculate billing rates (charge-out rates) and use these rates to allocate the SD costs to PDs: Total amount of SD cost that will be allocated across other dpt Total usage of SD that is recognised in the allocation method USING BILLING RATES Both the
您可能关注的文档
- 基于模型比较的服务品牌影响因素分析.pdf
- 基于炉气分析的转炉炼钢过程动态控制.pdf
- 基于逆向工程的领域本体开发方法.pdf
- 基于能力与忠诚度的汽车经销商竞争力评价矩阵研究.pdf
- 基于平衡记分理念,促进绩效考评改善.pdf
- 基于期权思想的风险企业增长期权溢价的定量模型研究.pdf
- 基于企业关系分析的供应链交易成本研究.pdf
- 基于企业家社会网络关系的小企业成长实证研究.pdf
- 基于区间数层次分析法的工程项目风险评估.pdf
- 基于区域集聚的集群供应链系统形成机理及其竞争优势研究.pdf
- 广东省广州省实验中学教育集团2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州大学附属中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期奥班期中物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十六中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中物理试题(含答案).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十九中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州市第二中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(含答案).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十六中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十九中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(含答案).docx
- 广东省广州市第二中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(解析版).docx
- 2026《中国人寿上海分公司营销员培训体系优化研究》18000字.docx
- 《生物探究性实验教学》中小学教师资格模拟试题.docx
原创力文档

文档评论(0)