死刑论文：论我国死刑复核程序的完善.docVIP

死刑论文：论我国死刑复核程序的完善 【中文摘要】死刑作为当今世界饱受争议的刑罚方式,如今在整个世界司法界被逐步削弱,甚至废除。我国作为死刑合法化国家的其中之一,旨在通过死刑刑罚制度弘扬社会正义、维护司法公正。死刑复核程序是我国为了监督死刑刑罚适用所设置的特殊程序,由我国最高人民法院以及高级人民法院在死刑(死缓)案件一审、二审后,判决生效前对案件进行最后核查,并裁定其是否予以执行。作为涉及剥夺被追诉者生命权利案件的最终审核程序,死刑复核程序可谓“生死攸关”。虽然现行死刑复核程序在我国司法界多年的改善下运行良好,但其仍然在争取“少杀”、评议规则、审理期限、监督体制、以及参与方式等几方面存在比较严重的缺陷,需要及时的给予立法完善。本文通过对死刑程序理论及实践的深度剖析,建议我国有关立法机关应当赋予死刑复核程序以对死刑案件免刑、减刑的权力,升级现有评议规则,明确审理期限的上限与下限,完善对死刑复核的监督体制,并且将其审理方式确定为听证形式为主。此完善建议将使得我国现行死刑复核程序以及整个死刑刑罚体系变得更加完善、健全。 【英文摘要】As the most disputable criminal punishment in the modern global law system, the use of death penalty has been reduced significantly or even revoked worldwide in recent years. People Republic of China is one of the countries which allow death penalty to be used today, and the mission of death penalty in China is to develop the righteousness among the whole society, and to keep administration of justice on a right track. Procedure of death penalty review is a very special process established only in China, which intends to supervise the operation of death penalty. In China, only the Supreme People抯 Court and the Higher People抯 Court are authorized to operate the procedure of death penalty review after first or second instance which related to a death penalty, and the procedure examines the whole case for the last time and give a final decision of death execution. Obviously, the procedure of death penalty review is the final examination to the lawsuits related to death penalty, which means it is definitely an important matter of life or death. Though the current procedure of death penalty review works pretty well after many improvements during recent years, it still has some significant problems in the deficiency of reducing death penalty, shortness of council principle, regulation absence for procedure time limit, lack of supervision mechanism, and participation manner. By researching on the practice and theory study of death penalty in the modern society, this paper argues that legislature in China should